 |
Quality
Knitting Limited
Quality
Knitting Limited of Toronto, Canada is a 51 year old
family run business that employs over 100 UFCW cutters and seamstresses.
They produce excellent knit products and jobs, providing a living
wage, pension, and 8 paid holidays per year. The company is committed
to having a diverse, inclusive, and positive work environment that
is completely sweatshop-free. As a proud member of the United Food
and Commercial Workers, Local 175 the employees have access to
dental, health, and life insurance, as well as to unique skill-building
initiatives that combine elements of leadership, education, and
communication. These workers make No Sweat’s women's yoga
pants, cami tank tops, women’s long sleeve tees, vintage
tees, the pigment dyed crewneck sweatshirt, and the heavyweight
hooded full zip and heavyweight quarter zip sweatshirts.
No Sweat™ Staff Visit to Quality
Knitting, Ltd
November
2006 Toronto, Canada
Reported by Jeff Ballinger
The Quality Knitting
shop is a throwback in every good sense of the word. From the welcoming “Visitor
Parking” space (in downtown Toronto!) to the creaking wooden
stairs and the union rep with satiny jacket covered almost entirely
with union insignias and slogans, I felt myself transported back
thirty years to a time when I worked for the Clothing and Textile
workers and regularly visited such workplaces. On a walk-around,
I saw no workers in grim hyper-stitching mode, furtively stealing
a glance up to see who was patrolling the aisles; I got a few friendly
nods but was blithely ignored by most. (Speaking of being ignored,
this was my first real look at posted “codes of conduct”.
I studied rather carefully the one for “Jones Apparel” – there
were several – and could not imagine workers seeing them
as anything but ethereal promises.)
The sight of many idle machines
always reminds one of the parlous state of this industry in developed
countries. Something like the creeping threat of a steadily swelling
creek amidst a weather forecast predicting “No end in sight” to
the rain. This shop had hundreds more workers in the 1970s, Bob
Kleinman explained to me, but never dipped below 250; the shop
that he and his brother took over from their dad, the founder,
never seriously considered closing because of declining margins,
or sending assembly work off-shore after the 80s’outsourcing
tsunami hit the rag trade.
Cynic that I am, I felt that it was
a good thing that Sidney (Bob’s brother and the guy who regularly
deals with No Sweat and “union” questions) was tending
to other business that morning of my visit. Bob had to dispatch
various office staff to dig out the union contract and separate
benefits agreement. Then, we had to painstakingly search out answers
to my questions about maternity leave, severance and the like.
In contrast to the typical eight-paragraph “code of conduct”,
these were legal documents with sub-clauses, qualifications and
sixty-odd pages of union- guaranteed rights and responsibilities,
enforced by a team of experts.
There was further encouragement
(again, tinged with nostalgia) derived from the fact that QK had
an entire line of clothing dubbed “Union Made Apparel”;
the company clearly sees an advantage in the conscious-consumer
market and this fact serves to further solidify the union’s
position there. Overall, a partner such as Quality Knitting gives
No Sweat rock-solid proof that the “No Sweatshop” promise
is no pipe-dream or mere hype, disconnected from reality.
|